CRIME…OR HOSPITAL CARE MISINTERPRETED?

When a child dies and there are signs of physical abnormalities—bruises, tearing, etc.—the result may be testimony of “unquestionable” or “unmistaken” signs of sexual abuse. That in turn may lead to criminal prosecution, conviction, and even a sentence of death. Yet both the advance of science and the simple act of paying greater attention to

NUMBERS DON’T LIE…IF WE UNDERSTAND THEM

We are lawyers because we were not the strongest at science or math, or so the popular trope goes.  But numbers pervade the courtroom – employment discrimination statistics, medical causation analysis, DNA probabilities, and occasionally the likelihood that a particular person committed the crime or that the act was criminal rather than accidental.  So it

A New (Confusing) Change to Pennsylvania’s Hearsay Rules

On October 25, 2018, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court adopted two amendments to the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence – the definitions of PRESENT SENSE IMPRESSIONS and EXCITED UTTERANCES both had new language added.  Each rule now concludes with the following statement: When the declarant is unidentified, the proponent shall show by independent corroborating evidence that the