Slow Motion Video: New Jersey Speaks

Slow the video down It moves too fast But watch out it makes intent really last Feelin’ groovy (with apologies to Simon and Garfunkle) The proliferation of video evidence- body cameras, store security footage, ring cameras, and the ubiquitous hand-held cellphone – can’t be questioned.  The use of video ranges from the high-profile cases, all

VISION SCIENCE “101” FOR TRIAL ADVOCACY

“Vision science” is an amalgam of information from multiple disciplines with multiple points of focus.  From the world of eyewitness identification we know two fundamental principles.  The first is that the mind is not a video camera: it captures only portions of the incoming data and what it does capture does not remain intact as

THE CHARACTER WITNESS CONUNDRUM

  Pennsylvania law, as does federal, permits a person accused of a crime to ‘defend’ in part by proving their ‘good’ character, limited to the pertinent trait.  If the crime is robbery or assault, the defense is that the accused is non-violent; and if the crime charged is forgery or theft, that the person is

ARE WE NO BETTER THAN GOLDFISH?

We’ve heard it at lectures, and perhaps echoed the claim ourselves – the attention span of a goldfish is 9 seconds, and that of humans is less.  As detailed in TIME Magazine, [r]esearchers in Canada surveyed 2,000 participants and studied the brain activity of 112 others using electroencephalograms (EEGs). Microsoft found that since the year

POLARIZE THE CASE

In one iteration of his “Ten Commandments” lecture on cross-examination, the famed advocacy teacher Irving Younger posited that ‘less is more.’  When showing a witness’ bias, you need not call them out as a liar; instead, simply argue in closing “and the witness, who testified for the defendant – it’s their mother.”  According to Younger,

TOOLMARK EVIDENCE: CAN’T LIVE WITH IT, CAN’T…

Criminal case investigations often start with Locard’s “exchange principle” – “It is impossible for a criminal to act, especially considering the intensity of a crime, without leaving traces of this presence.”  As otherwise described, “[t]his theory states that, whenever two objects come into contact, an exchange of materials occurs between them.” Mistek et al,  ,

BRAIN SCIENCE AND BRANDEIS BRIEFS

It should come as no surprise that evidence rules and their application are often without regard to, and indeed in conflict with, scientific findings.  That is a challenge every advocate faces, the law as it is versus the law as it should be.  But science can be enlisted to try and change evidence or evidence-related

If you were dishonest in the past…

There was a time in this nation’s history when jurors knew the witnesses – they were neighbors or more – and had some sense of who was reliable and who was not, who was prone to lie and who could be counted on to tell the truth.[1]  This was probably an imperfect tool, one subject