Skip to content
Advocacy and Evidence Resources
  • Home
  • A&E Blog
  • Brain Lessons
  • Recommended Reading
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Reports
    • Ohlbaum Scholarship Papers
    • Temple Advocacy Scholarship
  • Videos
    • Kolsby Lectures
    • Ross Lectures
    • Advocacy & Evidence Training
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame Lectures
    • Teaching Advocacy
  • Conferences
  • Web Links
Advocacy and Evidence Resources
  • Home
  • A&E Blog
  • Brain Lessons
  • Recommended Reading
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Reports
    • Ohlbaum Scholarship Papers
    • Temple Advocacy Scholarship
  • Videos
    • Kolsby Lectures
    • Ross Lectures
    • Advocacy & Evidence Training
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame Lectures
    • Teaching Advocacy
  • Conferences
  • Web Links

Advocacy and Evidence Blog

Is “Victim” Ever An Impermissible Term In Criminal Trials?

by Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)

Is it impermissible to use the term “victim” in a criminal trial? On its surface, the question may appear silly – the trial has a victim [accuser] and defendant [accused]. Yet the issue arises periodically, and was highlighted in recent trials. First, who or what is a victim? According to Black’s Law Dictionary, it is

Categories Advocacy, Advocacy and Evidence Blog, Criminal Law, Trial Advocacy

The One-Question Cross-Examination

by Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)

Despite familiarity with the phrase “less is more,” lawyers can’t seem to help themselves – they ask question after question after question. That this irks jurors is beyond doubt.  As one article written by a jurist who interviewed hundreds of jurors reported, The most important theme that came through on evidence presentation: do not repeat

Categories Advocacy and Evidence Blog, Trial Advocacy

CAN WE MAKE ‘SENSE’ OF THE KYLE RITTENOUSE ACQUITTAL?

by Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)

It is no surprise that many feel dismay over the acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse and see the verdict as resulting from the American tolerance of gun culture; a nearly all-white jury favoring a white defendant; a baby-faced [in the jurors’ eyes] teen who did not match a stereotype of a ‘gun-toting’ marauder; and a reaction

Categories Advocacy and Evidence Blog, Criminal Law, Trial Advocacy

DNA AS PROOF OF GUILT – OFTEN NECESSARY, NOT ALWAYS SUFFICIENT

by Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)

When is a DNA ‘match,’ the gold standard for forensic discipline, accurate but insufficient?  A recent decision of the Connecticut Supreme Court reminds us of the limits of even this most potent form of proof. The power of DNA to prove guilt, establish actual innocence, or ‘raise a reasonable doubt’ cannot be questioned.  More than

Categories Advocacy and Evidence Blog, Criminal Law

Be Not Proud of Pennsylvania’s Death Penalty

by Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)

The poet John Donne wrote the timeless words Death, be not proud, though some have called thee Mighty and dreadful, for thou are not so. But in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the more apt words might be Of our death penalty system BE NOT PROUD, For too many lawyers are not mighty but instead are

Categories Advocacy and Evidence Blog, Criminal Law, Trial Advocacy

DOES PENNSYLVANIA REQUIRE EXPERTS TO REPEAT INADMISSIBLE HEARSAY?

by Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)

There remains either disagreement or misunderstanding as to when an expert may [or must] repeat hearsay relied on to reach an opinion. At a Masters in Trial Advocacy EVIDENCE lecture we presented the following hypothetical:  An expert comes to court to testify about how a construction accident occurred. The expert states “I went to

Categories Advocacy and Evidence Blog, Evidence

MOVING TO STOP(?) IMPLICIT BIAS

by Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)

Biases distort judgment. It’s as simple as that. They skew how we think, what we believe, and the value we set when we judge the pain and loss of others. And of course this is not limited to law, lawyering and courts – the problem is everywhere. For example, studies have shown that in medicine

Categories Advocacy and Evidence Blog, Criminal Law, Trial Advocacy

Pennsylvania Has A Clear State Of Mind

by Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)

As the Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently stated, when dealing with hearsay “[t]hings can get complicated  pretty quickly…At times, the line that divides hearsay from non-hearsay can be difficult to discern.”  Nowhere is that more true than with “state of mind” hearsay; but a great deal of clarity has been brought to the issue as a

Categories Advocacy and Evidence Blog, Evidence

“Photogrammetry” Is Sharper Than The Eye

by Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)

The headline was simple – another person exonerated in a case where police claim he had confessed and where two eyewitnesses positively identified him.  But absent from the story was any mention of DNA as the exculpating tool.  Instead, it was reported as follows: The experts reviewed surveillance footage of the botched heist of Northeast

Categories Advocacy and Evidence Blog, Criminal Law, Evidence

Can We Trust Memory?

by Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)

Memory – how good is it?  The law favors memory – we make witnesses tell their stories months or years after an event but preclude use of their diaries or memos to the file.  And memory reliability gets ‘politicized‘ – those who prosecute often default in favor of trusting memories long after the event, while

Categories Advocacy and Evidence Blog, Criminal Law, Trial Advocacy
Post navigation
Older posts
Page1 Page2 … Page14 Next →

Recent Posts

  • Are Verdicts About “The Truth?”
  • BRAIN LESSONS: ORDER AS A FORM OF PERSUASION
  • BRAIN LESSONS: MATERIAL AND METAPHOR: THE STUFF OF SENSATIONAL JUDGMENTS
  • FORENSIC HYPNOSIS – AN OXYMORON
  • Were You Lying Then Or… A “Devastating” Method of Cross-Examination

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Advocacy @ Temple Law

  • Trial Advocacy at Temple Law
  • Temple’s National Trial Team
  • Appellate Advocacy at Temple Law
  • LL.M. in Trial Advocacy
  • Experiential Learning & Integrated Programs
  • Support Trial Advocacy at Temple Law

SUBSCRIBE

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new Temple Law Advocacy and Evidence Blog posts by email.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Temple University Beasley School of Law
1719 North Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
(215) 204-7861

  • Temple Law School
  • Temple University
  • Accessibility
  • Contact and Feedback
  • Privacy
© 2022 Temple University Beasley School of Law