J D Vance Fails Constitutional Law

In a law school class, one way to assess a student’s performance (and professionalism) is with Three Cs – consistency, clarity, and correctness.  Considering the Vice President’s recent attack on federal judges for reviewing the constitutionality of various Trump policies, by the standards that would be used to assess a law student’s competence (and fitness

IS DAUBERT GATEKEEPING MORE STRINGENT THAN EVER?

  The difference between Pennsylvania’s approach to judges and expert ‘gatekeeping’ and that under the Federal Rules of Evidence is stark.  For the Commonwealth and its Frye jurisprudence, judges are told to ‘leave science to the scientists.’  The proscription is clear and far-reaching: [T]rial courts may not question the merits of the expert’s scientific theories,

Is The Opinion “Lay” or “Expert?” — The Superior Court Has An Opinion (Maybe A Wrong One)

Lay opinion testimony is tolerated because, frankly, it is hard to find the line between fact and opinion (“she is tall,” “they appeared drunk,” “the car was way over the speed limit”) and because lay witnesses should be comfortable speaking in normal, conversational, easily-understood terms.  To ensure there is a foundation for the opinion rather

Justice Alito, Religion and Juries

When a prospective juror says “I believe homosexuality is a sin” just like stealing, may that person be the “fair and impartial” juror?  In a case brought by a lesbian prison guard whose claim is harassment on the job?  The default answer should be “no.” Yet according to Justice Samuel Alito the answer is presumptively

Slow Motion Video: New Jersey Speaks

Slow the video down It moves too fast But watch out it makes intent really last Feelin’ groovy (with apologies to Simon and Garfunkle) The proliferation of video evidence- body cameras, store security footage, ring cameras, and the ubiquitous hand-held cellphone – can’t be questioned.  The use of video ranges from the high-profile cases, all

THE CHARACTER WITNESS CONUNDRUM

  Pennsylvania law, as does federal, permits a person accused of a crime to ‘defend’ in part by proving their ‘good’ character, limited to the pertinent trait.  If the crime is robbery or assault, the defense is that the accused is non-violent; and if the crime charged is forgery or theft, that the person is