This Article examines the admissibility of women’s sexual fantasies
and dreams under the consent exception, traces its origins, highlights its
application, argues that sexual fantasies and dreams should not be
admissible under the consent exception, and proposes a practical solution
to address this problem.
Citation:
Albin, Appropriating Women’s Thoughts: The Admissibility of Sexual Fantasies and Dreams Under the Consent Exception to Rape Shield Laws,” 68 U. Kan. L. Rev. 617 (2020).