October 31, 2024
Barbara T. Sicalides (LAW ’89) outlines the FTC’s new rules governing premerger notification filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act.
August 5, 2024
Forrest Lovett (LAW ’19) co-authored an article discussing the unanimous jury verdict in Epic v. Google that Google unlawfully maintained a monopoly over its Google Play Store and Google Play Billing.
February 2, 2024
For the fourth time in five years, Temple Law has reigned supreme at the ABA’s Law Student Tax Challenge, thanks to outstanding performances by Victor Ficarra (LAW ’24) and Natalie Romano-Nuesch (LAW ’24).
August 9, 2023
Carl Hittinger (LAW ’79, B.A. ’76) of BakerHostetler co-authored an article with Marc Schildkraut and Tyson Herrold analyzing the legal implications of state COPA statutes, as well as an FTC Comment criticizing these laws.
Temple Law sent two teams of students to Villanova Law’s first-ever baseball arbitration negotiation competition. Both teams made it to the second day of negotiations, and Temple Law won the entire competition.
Jonathan Broder, former GC of Conrail and current Temple Law Adjunct Professor, discusses the growing movement to regulate Big Tech as public utilities and the obstacles to doing so.
COVID-19 has undoubtedly impacted the restaurant industry. Many iconic chains have been forced to close their underperforming locations. Huge franchisees of these chains have also reorganized under Chapter 11. But there is still hope. With reduced competition, bidding wars and increased merger-and-acquisition activity of restaurant chains have developed
Jon Shahar sits down with ABA Tax Section Competition Winners, Mike and Louis (LAW ‘21).
While it may seem justified for businesses facing increased costs in these trying COVID-19 pandemic times to add “COVID surcharges” to ensure they can keep their doors open, businesses and their corporate counsel should be aware that such surcharges can raise serious competition concerns and need to be carefully navigated.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a trailblazer on so many fronts. Her well-earned nickname “notorious RBG” is usually synonymous with gender equality, civil rights, and equal justice under the law. Her mark on the law is certainly indelible, and what she stood for as the second female Justice on the Court, (one who was deemed unworthy of any law firm job despite graduating first in her class from Columbia Law School) maybe even more so. But one area of the law in which her opinions in a most prolific career are rare, is that of antitrust.