January 12, 2026 The concept of whistleblowing has traditionally referred to individuals who expose organizational wrongdoing, often at significant personal risk. Historically, corporations were not viewed as whistleblowers, particularly with respect to reporting misconduct by their own employees or agents. Since the early 2000s, however, enforcement policies and regulatory incentives have increasingly encouraged corporate self-disclosure
March 5, 2024
Temple Law Professor Jonathan C. Lipson discusses the Third Circuit’s decision in the FTX bankruptcy, ordering an independent examiner to investigate various issues at FTX, including potential conflicts of interest with Sullivan & Cromwell.
October 23, 2023
Landon Farnsworth (LAW ’24) outlines trends in Philadelphia lawyers’ return to the office and its challenges, why employers are mandating the return, and why some employees are reluctant.
Carl Hittinger (LAW ’79, BA ’76) of BakerHostetler co-authored an article with Tyson Herrold discussing the history of baseball’s antitrust exemption and whether this judicially ordained exemption may be overturned by the current Supreme Court.
Sharon Klein (LAW ’78) of Blank Rome co-authored an article with Vanessa DiDomenico and Karen Shin discussing the value of and risks associated with implementing and optimizing big data in the maritime industry
Hannah Travaglini (LAW ’21) of Montgomery McCracken co-authored an article with Edward Schnitzer discussing the recent court decision in the LeClairRyan bankruptcy and, more broadly, the tax ramifications of different corporate entity structures during bankruptcy.
: On May 25, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reaffirmed the U.S. Constitution’s requirement of uniformity in bankruptcy legislation and rulemaking.
Companies providing information technology products and services to U.S. government agencies are now required to notify such agencies of cyber incidents and meet specific cybersecurity standards.
The European Commission has published updated versions of the standard contractual clauses for international transfers of personal data from the European Union (“EU”), enabling businesses to account for a variety of complex data transfers.
Luxury brands spend copious amounts of time, money, and resources to protect their brands, trademarks, and intellectual property. But even so, the counterfeit market keeps growing, and annual losses from counterfeit goods reach well into the billions. Leading luxury retailers are now turning to blockchain technologies in an effort to douse the flames. By providing accurate, transparent, and verified data directly to consumers, blockchain might allow luxury brands to radically change the playing field.