{"id":2029,"date":"2017-07-13T16:46:31","date_gmt":"2017-07-13T20:46:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/aer\/?p=2029"},"modified":"2021-12-16T14:58:22","modified_gmt":"2021-12-16T14:58:22","slug":"rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/","title":{"rendered":"RULE 609 VERSUS REHABILITATION: DOES WITNESS IMPEACHMENT DEFEAT REENTRY INTO SOCIETY?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As Washington continues to grapple with the nuances of lying, some\u00a0citizens suffer from a stigmatizing federal law that treats them as if they were convicted liars without any logical or scientific justification.<\/p>\n<p><!-- line 459 --><\/p>\n<p>Consider this scenario: An eyewitness foils a potential terrorist act, saving thousands of lives and earning praise from the community for bravery. The terrorism prosecution hinges on the testimony of the eyewitness. At trial, however, a judge allows the defense to argue that the eyewitness is an evil law-breaker who has a propensity to lie and should not be believed by the jury. The judge based the ruling on the eyewitness\u2019s nine-year-old felony conviction for drug possession \u2014 the only blemish in an otherwise exemplary life. The law calls such attacks felony impeachment.<\/p>\n<p>Legal? You bet. It happens almost daily in federal courts, and has been happening for more than 100 years.<\/p>\n<div id=\"ym_1168672699739126471\" class=\"ym\">Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, and most state rules, a witness who has a prior felony conviction is considered inherently evil, more likely to break the law again, and therefore less likely to abide by an oath to tell the truth. The law \u2014 Rule 609(a)(1) \u2014 applies to all felonies regardless of the crime. No link to lying or untruthfulness is required. The law\u2019s presumption of evil gives a judge wide discretion to allow witnesses in a civil or criminal case to have their credibility attacked based solely on a felony committed within the last 10 years.<\/div>\n<p>The time for change has come. Felony impeachment should be limited, as it is in Pennsylvania state courts, to only crimes related to untruthfulness. A witness convicted of lying under oath or making a false statement, can be attacked at trial as untruthful, but a witness convicted of robbing a bank or selling drugs, for example, should not be attacked as untruthful solely based on a prior felony conviction.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2033 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/law-dev.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2017\/07\/Second_Chance_Logo-STACKED_hires2-300x202.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"202\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Since Congress passed the Second Chance Act in 2008, our society has taken enormous strides to help ex-offenders, now known as \u201creturning citizens,\u201d successfully reenter our communities. Those men and women \u2014 an astounding 650,000 are released every year \u2014 have done their time and need help to ensure they can get a fresh start after years or decades in prison.\u00a0Research, led by LaSalle University Professor Caitlin Taylor, confirms the benefits of reentry programs, which help returning citizens resume lives as law-abiding and productive members of the community.<\/p>\n<div data-section-toggled=\"tog-300\">\n<div class=\"ad align--center js-toggle-ad\">\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-mrec-21\" data-google-query-id=\"CO3qsJ7NhNUCFdighwodjJMK6w\">\n<div id=\"google_ads_iframe_\/4495\/ph.opinion\/commentary_4__container__\">With assistance from reentry programs, returning citizens are more likely to stay out of prison, get an education, make better decisions, obtain a tax-paying job, and become role models and mentors for their children.\u00a0 The federal court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has been a trailblazer in this area since 2007, and more than half of the nation\u2019s 94 federal courts have launched similar initiatives.\u00a0 Prosecutors, judges, probation officers, legal scholars, and defense attorneys endorse this restorative approach. And taxpayers benefit by spending less on imprisonment, which costs $34,770 annually per inmate.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>The felony impeachment rule is rooted in an ancient legal notion that convicted felons could never testify in court. That prohibition disappeared more than a century ago. Yet legendary jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes declared that returning citizens remain burdened with an evil character from which a jury can conclude that they will lie under oath. Like Holmes\u2019 ruling authorizing forced sterilization in a 1927 Supreme Court decision, the felony impeachment rule is outdated, unjustified, and flawed.<\/p>\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-instream-1\" data-google-query-id=\"CJudrJ7NhNUCFaWjswodg0cIEg\">\n<div id=\"google_ads_iframe_\/4495\/ph.opinion\/commentary_2__container__\">Scientific research has uncovered no link between prior felony convictions and lying.\u00a0 Last year, legal scholars Michael Sacks and Barbara Spellman wrote in \u201cThe Psychological Foundations of Evidence Law\u201d that the research undermines Holmes\u2019 dubious premise. Moreover, the felony impeachment rule can have a chilling effect on defendants who fear that if they testify, a jury will misuse the felony conviction to conclude not that they are liars but that they are just bad people who have a propensity to commit crimes, regardless of the proof of their guilt. The law otherwise precludes such propensity evidence (\u201cbecause he did it before, he must have done it this time\u201d) as fundamentally unfair.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Our legal system must embrace efforts to restore justice by helping victims, offenders, their families, and the community move forward and heal. I realize this is not a simple task, especially when the underlying crimes are brutal or deadly, leaving lifelong damage. Yet branding all returning citizens as liars does little more than perpetuate an endless cycle of retribution. It does nothing to heal the wounds that scar so many of those impacted by crime, and the research establishes that it fails to help a jury find the truth. As a society, we can do better.<\/p>\n<p>Let us begin our quest to restore justice by burying Holmes\u2019 notion of humanity and evil. Federal law should restrict felony impeachment only to crimes related to untruthfulness. This reform will help the law shed dehumanizing labels that renew punishment already imposed for past offenses. Men and women who are given a fresh start after prison should not be stigmatized as liars based on a prior felony.<\/p>\n<p>After all, which one of us has never been given a second chance?<\/p>\n<p><!--googleoff: all--> <!--googleon: all--><\/p>\n<p><strong>Timothy R. Rice is a U.S. magistrate judge and former federal prosecutor who teaches evidence at Temple University\u2019s Beasley School of Law.\u00a0The views expressed, derived from a <a href=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/aer\/publication\/restoring-justice-purging-evil-federal-rule-evidence-609\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Temple Law Review article<\/a>, are his own.\u00a0 This shortened version of his analysis was originally published July 6, 2017 at\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.philly.com\/philly\/opinion\/commentary\/courts-must-stop-stigmatizing-all-felons-as-liars-20170706.html\">\\http:\/\/www.philly.com\/philly\/opinion\/commentary\/courts-must-stop-stigmatizing-all-felons-as-liars-20170706.html<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As Washington continues to grapple with the nuances of lying, some\u00a0citizens suffer from a stigmatizing federal law that treats them as if they were convicted liars without any logical or scientific justification. Consider this scenario: An eyewitness foils a potential terrorist act, saving thousands of lives and earning praise from the community for bravery. The<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"generate_page_header":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,3,6,7,11],"tags":[],"coauthors":[254],"class_list":["post-2029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-advocacy","category-advocacy-and-evidence-blog","category-criminal-law","category-evidence","category-trial-advocacy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>RULE 609 VERSUS REHABILITATION: DOES WITNESS IMPEACHMENT DEFEAT REENTRY INTO SOCIETY? - Advocacy and Evidence Resources<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"RULE 609 VERSUS REHABILITATION: DOES WITNESS IMPEACHMENT DEFEAT REENTRY INTO SOCIETY? - Advocacy and Evidence Resources\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"As Washington continues to grapple with the nuances of lying, some\u00a0citizens suffer from a stigmatizing federal law that treats them as if they were convicted liars without any logical or scientific justification. Consider this scenario: An eyewitness foils a potential terrorist act, saving thousands of lives and earning praise from the community for bravery. The\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advocacy and Evidence Resources\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-07-13T20:46:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-12-16T14:58:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/07\/Second_Chance_Logo-STACKED_hires2-scaled-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1720\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Magistrate Judge Timothy Rice\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Magistrate Judge Timothy Rice\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#\/schema\/person\/ebe47f403ad14e2c5faec834f2d8472e\"},\"headline\":\"RULE 609 VERSUS REHABILITATION: DOES WITNESS IMPEACHMENT DEFEAT REENTRY INTO SOCIETY?\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-07-13T20:46:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-16T14:58:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/\"},\"wordCount\":915,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law-dev.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2017\/07\/Second_Chance_Logo-STACKED_hires2-300x202.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Advocacy\",\"Advocacy and Evidence Blog\",\"Criminal Law\",\"Evidence\",\"Trial Advocacy\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/\",\"name\":\"RULE 609 VERSUS REHABILITATION: DOES WITNESS IMPEACHMENT DEFEAT REENTRY INTO SOCIETY? - Advocacy and Evidence Resources\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law-dev.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2017\/07\/Second_Chance_Logo-STACKED_hires2-300x202.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-07-13T20:46:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-16T14:58:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law-dev.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2017\/07\/Second_Chance_Logo-STACKED_hires2-300x202.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/law-dev.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2017\/07\/Second_Chance_Logo-STACKED_hires2-300x202.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"RULE 609 VERSUS REHABILITATION: DOES WITNESS IMPEACHMENT DEFEAT REENTRY INTO SOCIETY?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/\",\"name\":\"Advocacy and Evidence Resources\",\"description\":\"Just another Law Sites site\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advocacy and Evidence Resources\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2021\/07\/AER-LOGO.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2021\/07\/AER-LOGO.png\",\"width\":711,\"height\":220,\"caption\":\"Advocacy and Evidence Resources\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#\/schema\/person\/ebe47f403ad14e2c5faec834f2d8472e\",\"name\":\"Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d2a56b84151f5331c5c999af7a12cc505aeed9fec929142bc9dd30b398301e5b?s=96&d=mm&r=g6b68adb939ecac32ef61d8026f0bafe4\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d2a56b84151f5331c5c999af7a12cc505aeed9fec929142bc9dd30b398301e5b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d2a56b84151f5331c5c999af7a12cc505aeed9fec929142bc9dd30b398301e5b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/author\/tug27334\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"RULE 609 VERSUS REHABILITATION: DOES WITNESS IMPEACHMENT DEFEAT REENTRY INTO SOCIETY? - Advocacy and Evidence Resources","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"RULE 609 VERSUS REHABILITATION: DOES WITNESS IMPEACHMENT DEFEAT REENTRY INTO SOCIETY? - Advocacy and Evidence Resources","og_description":"As Washington continues to grapple with the nuances of lying, some\u00a0citizens suffer from a stigmatizing federal law that treats them as if they were convicted liars without any logical or scientific justification. Consider this scenario: An eyewitness foils a potential terrorist act, saving thousands of lives and earning praise from the community for bravery. The","og_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/","og_site_name":"Advocacy and Evidence Resources","article_published_time":"2017-07-13T20:46:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-12-16T14:58:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1720,"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/07\/Second_Chance_Logo-STACKED_hires2-scaled-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Magistrate Judge Timothy Rice","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Magistrate Judge Timothy Rice","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/"},"author":{"name":"Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#\/schema\/person\/ebe47f403ad14e2c5faec834f2d8472e"},"headline":"RULE 609 VERSUS REHABILITATION: DOES WITNESS IMPEACHMENT DEFEAT REENTRY INTO SOCIETY?","datePublished":"2017-07-13T20:46:31+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-16T14:58:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/"},"wordCount":915,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law-dev.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2017\/07\/Second_Chance_Logo-STACKED_hires2-300x202.jpg","articleSection":["Advocacy","Advocacy and Evidence Blog","Criminal Law","Evidence","Trial Advocacy"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/","name":"RULE 609 VERSUS REHABILITATION: DOES WITNESS IMPEACHMENT DEFEAT REENTRY INTO SOCIETY? - Advocacy and Evidence Resources","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law-dev.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2017\/07\/Second_Chance_Logo-STACKED_hires2-300x202.jpg","datePublished":"2017-07-13T20:46:31+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-16T14:58:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/law-dev.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2017\/07\/Second_Chance_Logo-STACKED_hires2-300x202.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/law-dev.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2017\/07\/Second_Chance_Logo-STACKED_hires2-300x202.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2017\/07\/13\/rule-609-versus-rehabilitation-witness-impeachment-defeat-reentry-society\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"RULE 609 VERSUS REHABILITATION: DOES WITNESS IMPEACHMENT DEFEAT REENTRY INTO SOCIETY?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#website","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/","name":"Advocacy and Evidence Resources","description":"Just another Law Sites site","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#organization","name":"Advocacy and Evidence Resources","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2021\/07\/AER-LOGO.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2021\/07\/AER-LOGO.png","width":711,"height":220,"caption":"Advocacy and Evidence Resources"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/#\/schema\/person\/ebe47f403ad14e2c5faec834f2d8472e","name":"Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d2a56b84151f5331c5c999af7a12cc505aeed9fec929142bc9dd30b398301e5b?s=96&d=mm&r=g6b68adb939ecac32ef61d8026f0bafe4","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d2a56b84151f5331c5c999af7a12cc505aeed9fec929142bc9dd30b398301e5b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d2a56b84151f5331c5c999af7a12cc505aeed9fec929142bc9dd30b398301e5b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jules M Epstein (hehimhis)"},"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/author\/tug27334\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2029"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2029\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3408,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2029\/revisions\/3408"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2029"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}