{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Advocacy and Evidence Resources","provider_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer","title":"IS DAUBERT GATEKEEPING MORE STRINGENT THAN EVER? - Advocacy and Evidence Resources","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WpUT9GNo0H\"><a href=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2025\/02\/16\/is-daubert-gatekeeping-more-stringent-than-ever\/\">IS DAUBERT GATEKEEPING MORE STRINGENT THAN EVER?<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/2025\/02\/16\/is-daubert-gatekeeping-more-stringent-than-ever\/embed\/#?secret=WpUT9GNo0H\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;IS DAUBERT GATEKEEPING MORE STRINGENT THAN EVER?&#8221; &#8212; Advocacy and Evidence Resources\" data-secret=\"WpUT9GNo0H\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/aer\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"&nbsp; The difference between Pennsylvania\u2019s approach to judges and expert \u2018gatekeeping\u2019 and that under the Federal Rules of Evidence is stark.\u00a0 For the Commonwealth and its Frye jurisprudence, judges are told to \u2018leave science to the scientists.\u2019\u00a0 The proscription is clear and far-reaching: [T]rial courts may not question the merits of the expert&#8217;s scientific theories,"}