{"id":63,"date":"2014-09-25T15:15:05","date_gmt":"2014-09-25T15:15:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/10q\/?p=63"},"modified":"2014-09-25T15:15:05","modified_gmt":"2014-09-25T15:15:05","slug":"supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court Protects Broadcasters from Competition, for now: ABC v. Aereo"},"content":{"rendered":"

In ABC v. Aereo, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that Aereo, Inc.\u2019s subscription service – which gave subscribers access over the Internet to a miniature TV antenna and a miniature DVR housed in Aereo\u2019s facility, allowing them to record over-the-air broadcast television signals (like the ones transmitted by your local ABC affiliate) and to re-transmit those recordings to themselves at a later time over the Internet – infringed the broadcasters\u2019 copyrights in their programming.<\/p>\n

The Copyright Act gives the owners of the copyright in an \u201caudiovisual work\u201d \u2013 an episode, say, of \u201cThe Good Wife,\u201d or \u201cCSI: Miami\u201d – the exclusive right to (among other things) \u201cperform the copyrighted work publicly,\u201d which is defined to include \u201ctransmit[ting] or otherwise communicat[ing] a performance . . . of the work . . . to the public.\u201d So the narrow question in the case was: did Aereo \u201ctransmit or otherwise communicate a performance\u201d of last night\u2019s episode of The Good Wife \u201cto the public\u201d?<\/p>\n

On behalf of a group of 36 copyright law professors, I co-authored an amicus brief<\/a> arguing that it did not, largely on the ground that Aereo was simply providing equipment enabling individual consumers to do something copyright law allows them to do: to record for themselves, and play back to themselves, over-the-air TV broadcasts. It\u2019s just like giving (or leasing) to each of them a rooftop TV antenna connected to a DVR; nobody would suggest that the supplier of that equipment was \u201cpublicly performing\u201d copyrighted works. Enabling a million such private performances of The Good Wife, we argued, does not equal a public performance; a million times zero is still zero.<\/p>\n

We were delighted when we saw that Justice Scalia\u2019s opinion cited, and relied quite heavily upon, our arguments \u2013 though our delight was tempered by the fact that Justice Scalia wrote in dissent (on behalf of himself and Justices Thomas and Alito).<\/p>\n

Justice Breyer\u2019s opinion for the majority took a different tack, rejecting our rooftop-antenna-plus-DVR metaphor for a different one: that Aereo is, in effect, a cable system. Cable systems re-transmit over-the-air television broadcasts to paying customers all the time; in fact, they are required to do so (by the so-called \u201cmust-carry\u201d provisions of a different statute, the Communications Act). And \u00a7 111 of the Copyright Act \u2013 one of the most impenetrable and complex provisions of federal law I have ever encountered \u2013 makes them liable as infringers when they do (and, simultaneously, provides them with a statutory license for doing so, at a statutorily set rate payable to the broadcasters).<\/p>\n

Aereo, the Court held, is doing what cable systems do: re-transmitting over-the-air broadcast TV signals to its subscribers. Cable systems pay a royalty for the privilege, and it would upset Congress\u2019 \u201cregulatory purpose\u201d in this \u201cintricate regulatory scheme\u201d to allow Aereo to offer the same service to consumers on a royalty-free basis.<\/p>\n

The Court was presented with arguments on the broadcasters\u2019 side that could have had major implications for copyright law and for the many industries \u2013 from online streaming to cloud computing to social media \u2013 who are dependent upon settled understandings of their copyright liability. The majority, I\u2019m happy to say, declined the opportunity to adopt them. Justice Breyer takes great pains, at several points in the opinion, to emphasize the narrow scope of its holding. While Congress did intend the re-transmission provisions \u201cto apply broadly to cable companies and their equivalents,” it didn\u2019t \u201cintend to discourage or to control the emergence or use of different kinds of technologies,\u201d and the Court\u2019s \u201climited holding today\u201d won\u2019t have that effect. Id.<\/p>\n

\u201cQuestions involving cloud computing,[remote storage] DVRs, and other novel issues not before the Court, as to which \u2018Congress has not plainly marked [the] course,\u2019 should await a case in which they are squarely presented.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This case, the Court repeats at several junctures, is just about broadcast television and the re-transmission of over-the-air broadcast TV signals. Congress has made a choice about what you may or may not do with those signals: anyone who re-transmits them (like the cable companies do) must pay royalties to the broadcasters when they do so. It is only Aereo\u2019s \u201coverwhelming likeness to the cable companies targeted by the 1976 amendments [to the Copyright Act],\u201d and the \u201cmany similarities between Aereo and cable companies\u201d viewed \u201cin terms of Congress\u2019 regulatory objectives,\u201d id.,that carried the day here.<\/p>\n

So if you\u2019re not doing that \u2013 re-transmitting over-the-air broadcast TV signals \u2013 you can continue to go about your business without worrying unduly about the implications of this decision. Because the decision has little or nothing to say about any content-delivery or content-storage platforms that deal with the vast array of non-broadcast-TV content, it is likely to have limited consequences for larger questions of copyright law outside of broadcast TV (though it will, of course, have major implications for broadcast television economics). And I don\u2019t think I\u2019m giving away any secrets here when I say that over-the-air television broadcasting is probably not where the action is going to be over the next 10 or 20 years, as content continues its migration from broadcast TV to other platforms (cable, cellular network, wireless Internet). Precisely the way Justice Breyer intended it, I believe.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In ABC v. Aereo, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that Aereo, Inc.\u2019s subscription service – which gave subscribers access over the Internet to a miniature TV antenna and a miniature DVR housed in Aereo\u2019s facility, allowing them to record over-the-air broadcast television signals (like the ones transmitted by your local ABC affiliate)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":134,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,36],"tags":[],"coauthors":[35],"class_list":["post-63","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-faculty-authored","category-intellectual-property","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Supreme Court Protects Broadcasters from Competition, for now: ABC v. Aereo - The Temple 10-Q<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Supreme Court Protects Broadcasters from Competition, for now: ABC v. Aereo - The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In ABC v. Aereo, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that Aereo, Inc.\u2019s subscription service – which gave subscribers access over the Internet to a miniature TV antenna and a miniature DVR housed in Aereo\u2019s facility, allowing them to record over-the-air broadcast television signals (like the ones transmitted by your local ABC affiliate)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-09-25T15:15:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"David G. Post\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"David G. Post\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Books Schatschneider\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154\"},\"headline\":\"The Supreme Court Protects Broadcasters from Competition, for now: ABC v. Aereo\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-09-25T15:15:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/\"},\"wordCount\":881,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2014\/12\/Aereo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Faculty Authored\",\"Intellectual Property\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/\",\"name\":\"The Supreme Court Protects Broadcasters from Competition, for now: ABC v. Aereo - The Temple 10-Q\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2014\/12\/Aereo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-09-25T15:15:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2014\/12\/Aereo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2014\/12\/Aereo.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Evening Watching Television\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Supreme Court Protects Broadcasters from Competition, for now: ABC v. Aereo\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\",\"name\":\"The Temple 10-Q\",\"description\":\"Temple's Business Law Magazine\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154\",\"name\":\"Books Schatschneider\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g9dc77189f33a293d2c82a50cd24ebb9f\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Books Schatschneider\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/rschatsc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Supreme Court Protects Broadcasters from Competition, for now: ABC v. Aereo - The Temple 10-Q","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Supreme Court Protects Broadcasters from Competition, for now: ABC v. Aereo - The Temple 10-Q","og_description":"In ABC v. Aereo, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that Aereo, Inc.\u2019s subscription service – which gave subscribers access over the Internet to a miniature TV antenna and a miniature DVR housed in Aereo\u2019s facility, allowing them to record over-the-air broadcast television signals (like the ones transmitted by your local ABC affiliate)","og_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/","og_site_name":"The Temple 10-Q","article_published_time":"2014-09-25T15:15:05+00:00","author":"David G. Post","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"David G. Post","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/"},"author":{"name":"Books Schatschneider","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154"},"headline":"The Supreme Court Protects Broadcasters from Competition, for now: ABC v. Aereo","datePublished":"2014-09-25T15:15:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/"},"wordCount":881,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2014\/12\/Aereo.jpg","articleSection":["Faculty Authored","Intellectual Property"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/","name":"The Supreme Court Protects Broadcasters from Competition, for now: ABC v. Aereo - The Temple 10-Q","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2014\/12\/Aereo.jpg","datePublished":"2014-09-25T15:15:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2014\/12\/Aereo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2014\/12\/Aereo.jpg","width":1024,"height":512,"caption":"Evening Watching Television"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-protects-broadcasters-competition-now-abc-v-aereo\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Supreme Court Protects Broadcasters from Competition, for now: ABC v. Aereo"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/","name":"The Temple 10-Q","description":"Temple's Business Law Magazine","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154","name":"Books Schatschneider","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g9dc77189f33a293d2c82a50cd24ebb9f","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Books Schatschneider"},"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/rschatsc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2014\/12\/Aereo.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/134"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=63"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}