{"id":4447,"date":"2026-02-04T15:46:15","date_gmt":"2026-02-04T20:46:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?p=4447"},"modified":"2026-02-04T15:46:15","modified_gmt":"2026-02-04T20:46:15","slug":"navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/","title":{"rendered":"Navigating Patent Eligibility in the Age of AI: Strategic Insights from the USPTO\u2019s August 2025 Guidance"},"content":{"rendered":"

February 4, 2026<\/p>\n

The August 4, 2025 memorandum (Memo) issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) clarifies how examiners should approach subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. \u00a7 101. \u00a0It raises the bar for \u00a7 101 rejections and offers applicants new tools to defend their claims.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Memo explicitly instructs examiners not to expand the mental process category to encompass claim limitations that cannot practically be performed in the human mind. For example, limitations involving (i) complex neural network operations, (ii) multidimensional matrix calculations, or (iii) hardware-specific AI implementations are generallyrecognized as being outside the scope of mental processes, even if they involve mathematical concepts. This may particularly aid technologies directed to LLMs, computer vision and ML accelerators.<\/p>\n

The Memo draws a critical distinction between claims that\u00a0recite\u00a0a judicial exception and those that merely\u00a0involve one. This nuance has practical consequences under Step 2A Prong One of the\u00a0Alice\/Mayo\u00a0framework. For instance, a claim that recites a backpropagation algorithm or gradient descent algorithm may be subject to further eligibility analysis because that claim requires specific mathematical calculations by referring to the mathematical calculations by name. Meanwhile, a claim that involves training a neural network using a dataset but without also specifying the algorithm would not require further analysis Such a claim is presumed subject matter eligible under Step 2A Prong One.<\/p>\n

The Memo also states that examiners should evaluate each \u201cclaim as a whole\u201d with respect to Step 2A Prong Two. Examiners are required to assess how all claim limitations interact to whether the judicial exception is integrated into a practical application.\u00a0 This holistic approach aligns with Federal Circuit precedent, including\u00a0McRO v. Bandai Namco<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0Amdocs v. Openet<\/em>, which recognize that specific technological solutions can render claims patent-eligible.<\/p>\n

In addition, the Memo reminds examiners to consult the specification to determine whether the disclosed invention improves a technology or a technical field. The Memo explains that the claim itself does not need to explicitly recite the improvement described in the specification. The Memo cautions examiners to avoid the \u201capply it\u201d trap of oversimplifying claim limitations as technological improvements demonstrate integration into a practical application or \u201csignificantly more\u201d than the exception.<\/strong><\/p>\n

One of the most impactful parts of the Memo is Section III. Here, the USPTO instructs that if it is \u201ca close call,\u201d examiners should make a rejection only when it is\u00a0more likely than not\u00a0\u2013 greater than a 50 % probability \u2013 that a claim is ineligible.<\/p>\n

Moving Forward<\/p>\n

The Memo provides a range of strategic considerations for applicants. When responding to existing \u00a7 101 rejections, Applicants may consider the following arguments. First, arguing the claim limitations cannot be performed in the human mind under Step 2A Prong One (i.e.<\/em>, Mental Process Exclusion). Second, casting doubt on the strength of the rejection and emphasize the Memo\u2019s push against claim ineligibility when the probability is\u00a0NOT\u00a0more likely than not (i.e.<\/em>, the \u201cclose call\u201d standard). Third, challenge the examiner\u2019s position based on an integrated analysis of the claim features directed to improving computer functionality or other technology under Step 2A Prong Two to show that the claim provides a technological improvement, not that the claim recites a judicial exception as a tool to perform an existing process.<\/p>\n

Further, companies may wish to reassess previously abandoned applications that received \u00a7 101 rejections. <\/span>\u00a0as applications and continuations may have a higher likelihood of success moving forward, especially in AI and software.<\/p>\n

For the full article, see: IP Intelligence Report<\/em> available at: https:\/\/www.bakerlaw.com\/insights\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Aaron B. Rabinowitz<\/em><\/strong> graduated Temple Law in 2004. Rabinowitz is currently a patent attorney and business advisor who has worked for more than 15 years with emerging companies, public corporations and research institutions to identify their key intellectual property at the earliest stage, efficiently secure broad protection for that intellectual property in the U.S. and abroad and execute opportunities to monetize that intellectual property. Aaron builds and maintains patent and trade secret portfolios in nearly every technology, and he has a favorable track record in even the most demanding patent office examination and appeal procedures. Aaron is co-leader of the IP Technology team.<\/p>\n

Tayan B. Patel<\/em><\/strong> graduated Rutgers Law in 2006.Tayan is co-leader of BakerHostetler\u2019s Intellectual Property (IP) Technology team. His practice focuses on IP and technology-centric transactions and strategic portfolio counseling involving auditing, governance, procurement, enforcement and risk management touching emerging\/high-tech and the life sciences. With more than 20 years of significant legal experience, Tayan is uniquely qualified not only to deliver results clients expect but also develop and execute strategies they may not have known were even possible. From mature technology start-ups to Fortune 50 companies, Tayan employs a holistic approach to understand key stakeholders\u2019 objectives and provide practical business advice. He then leads teams of attorneys to execute their strategic vision.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

February 4, 2026 The August 4, 2025 memorandum (Memo) issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) clarifies how examiners should approach subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. \u00a7 101. \u00a0It raises the bar for \u00a7 101 rejections and offers applicants new tools to defend their claims. The Memo explicitly instructs examiners not to<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":59,"featured_media":4451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2718,36,61],"tags":[],"coauthors":[2951,2952],"class_list":["post-4447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ai-resources","category-intellectual-property","category-legal-developments","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"yoast_head":"\nNavigating Patent Eligibility in the Age of AI: Strategic Insights from the USPTO\u2019s August 2025 Guidance - The Temple 10-Q<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Navigating Patent Eligibility in the Age of AI: Strategic Insights from the USPTO\u2019s August 2025 Guidance - The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"February 4, 2026 The August 4, 2025 memorandum (Memo) issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) clarifies how examiners should approach subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. \u00a7 101. \u00a0It raises the bar for \u00a7 101 rejections and offers applicants new tools to defend their claims. The Memo explicitly instructs examiners not to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-04T20:46:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2026\/02\/Rabinowitz_Option-1-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1440\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aaron B. Rabinowitz (LAW \u201904), Tayan B. Patel\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aaron B. Rabinowitz (LAW \u201904), Tayan B. Patel\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Tameka A. Barnes\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/5ae2f2fed1b6b7532f3c2f17ba95d5c4\"},\"headline\":\"Navigating Patent Eligibility in the Age of AI: Strategic Insights from the USPTO\u2019s August 2025 Guidance\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-04T20:46:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/\"},\"wordCount\":810,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2026\/02\/Rabinowitz_Option-1-scaled.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"AI Resources\",\"Intellectual Property\",\"Legal Developments\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/\",\"name\":\"Navigating Patent Eligibility in the Age of AI: Strategic Insights from the USPTO\u2019s August 2025 Guidance - The Temple 10-Q\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2026\/02\/Rabinowitz_Option-1-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-04T20:46:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/5ae2f2fed1b6b7532f3c2f17ba95d5c4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2026\/02\/Rabinowitz_Option-1-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2026\/02\/Rabinowitz_Option-1-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1440},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Navigating Patent Eligibility in the Age of AI: Strategic Insights from the USPTO\u2019s August 2025 Guidance\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\",\"name\":\"The Temple 10-Q\",\"description\":\"Temple's Business Law Magazine\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/5ae2f2fed1b6b7532f3c2f17ba95d5c4\",\"name\":\"Tameka A. Barnes\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b79c941bd5f8089182ae00944908153958ca9043bbbee7ec112ef42e8b5a95e9?s=96&d=mm&r=g525014dce3c80ead75f331a22e3ab869\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b79c941bd5f8089182ae00944908153958ca9043bbbee7ec112ef42e8b5a95e9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b79c941bd5f8089182ae00944908153958ca9043bbbee7ec112ef42e8b5a95e9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Tameka A. Barnes\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/tur80994\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Navigating Patent Eligibility in the Age of AI: Strategic Insights from the USPTO\u2019s August 2025 Guidance - The Temple 10-Q","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Navigating Patent Eligibility in the Age of AI: Strategic Insights from the USPTO\u2019s August 2025 Guidance - The Temple 10-Q","og_description":"February 4, 2026 The August 4, 2025 memorandum (Memo) issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) clarifies how examiners should approach subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. \u00a7 101. \u00a0It raises the bar for \u00a7 101 rejections and offers applicants new tools to defend their claims. The Memo explicitly instructs examiners not to","og_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/","og_site_name":"The Temple 10-Q","article_published_time":"2026-02-04T20:46:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1440,"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2026\/02\/Rabinowitz_Option-1-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Aaron B. Rabinowitz (LAW \u201904), Tayan B. Patel","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aaron B. Rabinowitz (LAW \u201904), Tayan B. Patel","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/"},"author":{"name":"Tameka A. Barnes","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/5ae2f2fed1b6b7532f3c2f17ba95d5c4"},"headline":"Navigating Patent Eligibility in the Age of AI: Strategic Insights from the USPTO\u2019s August 2025 Guidance","datePublished":"2026-02-04T20:46:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/"},"wordCount":810,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2026\/02\/Rabinowitz_Option-1-scaled.jpg","articleSection":["AI Resources","Intellectual Property","Legal Developments"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/","name":"Navigating Patent Eligibility in the Age of AI: Strategic Insights from the USPTO\u2019s August 2025 Guidance - The Temple 10-Q","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2026\/02\/Rabinowitz_Option-1-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2026-02-04T20:46:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/5ae2f2fed1b6b7532f3c2f17ba95d5c4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2026\/02\/Rabinowitz_Option-1-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2026\/02\/Rabinowitz_Option-1-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1440},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/navigating-patent-eligibility-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-insights-from-the-usptos-august-2025-guidance\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Navigating Patent Eligibility in the Age of AI: Strategic Insights from the USPTO\u2019s August 2025 Guidance"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/","name":"The Temple 10-Q","description":"Temple's Business Law Magazine","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/5ae2f2fed1b6b7532f3c2f17ba95d5c4","name":"Tameka A. Barnes","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b79c941bd5f8089182ae00944908153958ca9043bbbee7ec112ef42e8b5a95e9?s=96&d=mm&r=g525014dce3c80ead75f331a22e3ab869","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b79c941bd5f8089182ae00944908153958ca9043bbbee7ec112ef42e8b5a95e9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b79c941bd5f8089182ae00944908153958ca9043bbbee7ec112ef42e8b5a95e9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Tameka A. Barnes"},"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/tur80994\/"}]}},"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2026\/02\/Rabinowitz_Option-1-scaled.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/59"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4447"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4452,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4447\/revisions\/4452"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4447"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}