{"id":3565,"date":"2023-04-04T11:14:18","date_gmt":"2023-04-04T15:14:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/10q\/?p=3565"},"modified":"2023-04-04T11:14:18","modified_gmt":"2023-04-04T15:14:18","slug":"tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/","title":{"rendered":"Tax Quarterly: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Hears Oral Argument in <i>Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia<\/i>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><u>Facts &amp; Procedural History<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On March 7, 2023, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/casetext.com\/case\/zilka-v-tax-review-bd-city-of-philadelphia\">Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia<\/a><\/em> was argued before the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Diane Zilka, the Appellant, was a resident of Philadelphia but worked in Wilmington. As a result, she owed taxes to four jurisdictions: (1) Pennsylvania; (2) Philadelphia; (3) Delaware; and (4) Wilmington.<\/p>\n<p>Pennsylvania permits residents who work out of state, and therefore owe taxes to another state, to claim the amount of tax paid to that other state as a credit to offset the taxpayer\u2019s Pennsylvania tax bill.&nbsp; The taxpayer consequently claimed a credit for her Delaware tax (5%) to offset her Pennsylvania tax (3.07%).&nbsp; Since Pennsylvania has a lower state tax rate than that of Delaware, Pennsylvania allowed the taxpayer to apply this credit to the extent of her Pennsylvania tax of 3.07%, thereby creating 1.93% of taxes paid to Delaware but not permitted as a credit against the taxpayer\u2019s Pennsylvania state income taxes.<\/p>\n<p>Then, in addition to claiming a credit for the amount of Wilmington tax paid (1.25%) to offset her Philadelphia tax (3.92%), the taxpayer also attempted to claim a credit against her Philadelphia tax for the 1.93% unused credit that could not be applied at the state level. &nbsp;The Philadelphia Department of Revenue allowed the taxpayer\u2019s credit for her Wilmington tax paid of 1.25% against her Philadelphia tax bill, but it forbid the application of the 1.93% unused credit from her Delaware tax as a credit against her Philadelphia taxes.<\/p>\n<p>The taxpayer appealed the Philadelphia Department of Revenue\u2019s denial of her credit to the Tax Review Board of Philadelphia, claiming that she was entitled to this credit from Philadelphia since she owed 1.93% more in taxes than other Philadelphia residents who work entirely in-state, solely by virtue of her interstate work.&nbsp; She alleged that such a tax scheme resulted in an infringement on interstate commerce in violation of the U.S. Constitution\u2019s Commerce Clause.<\/p>\n<p>The Tax Review Board denied her appeal, and the Court of Common Pleas and the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania both affirmed, holding that Philadelphia\u2019s rejection of the taxpayer\u2019s credit did not amount to double taxation and, therefore, was not an unconstitutional hinderance on interstate commerce.<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Overview<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Legal scholars disagree over the merits of both parties\u2019 respective arguments. Supporters of the taxpayer\u2019s position contend that the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case of <em><a href=\"https:\/\/casetext.com\/case\/md-state-comptroller-of-the-treasury-v-wynne-4\">Comptroller of Maryland v. Wynne<\/a><\/em> requires that, for dormant Commerce Clause purposes, a state\u2019s income tax scheme must be evaluated as a whole, inclusive of all the taxes of a state\u2019s political subdivisions. A state\u2019s own labeling of a tax as a city or county tax is irrelevant since political subdivisions are creatures of the state, whose only authority to tax is that which is explicitly granted by the state.<\/p>\n<p>Under such a view, the taxpayer argues that the City of Philadelphia should have provided her with a tax credit for her excess credit derived at the state level, since it being a state level credit is of no constitutional consequence under <em>Wynne<\/em>\u2019s aggregate approach. And, because Philadelphia denied the credit, the taxpayer\u2014who engaged in interstate economic activity\u2014was subject to a higher tax rate than her counterparts who confined their activity to solely within the state, which is a dormant Commerce Clause violation.<\/p>\n<p>However, the City of Philadelphia asserts that it charges the same rate of tax on all residents, so its tax scheme cannot be discriminatory under the dormant Commerce Clause. Moreover, the City contends that the facts of the relevant tax in <em>Wynne <\/em>are distinguishable from the characteristics of Philadelphia\u2019s wage tax. Finally, the City argues that the fact that the taxpayer incurs a greater rate of tax is a constitutional interaction of two different but nondiscriminatory tax schemes.<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Takeaways<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Only time will tell which way the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania will rule. However, there are some important considerations\u2014aside from the constitutional issues\u2014that should be considered.<\/p>\n<p>First, there are tax policy principles supporting both sides. On the taxpayer\u2019s end, there appears to be a lack of proportionality and certainty with regard to the interaction of state and local tax schemes, which economists have long held are detrimental to sound tax policy. However, from Philadelphia\u2019s perspective, the City ought not be forced to foot the bill resulting from the lack of harmonization between the state income tax rates of Pennsylvania and Delaware.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the U.S. Supreme Court has been hesitant to get involved in clearing up much of the prevailing uncertainty in interstate taxation, most recently <a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxpolicycenter.org\/taxvox\/supreme-court-punts-state-tax-question-about-remote-work\">declining to hear <em>New Hampshire v. Massachusetts<\/em><\/a>, despite fourteen states submitting briefs to the Court\u2014an indication of the pervasiveness of the issue. So, perhaps <em>Zilka <\/em>may be the case that breaks that trend of Supreme Court deferral.<\/p>\n<p>Lastly, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way many people work. With remote work opportunities on the rise, more and more taxpayers will likely be in Ms. Zilka\u2019s position of interstate employment. As such, now it is more important than ever to clear up these uncertainties in the state and local taxation realm; otherwise, more uncertainty will breed more litigation costs for taxpayers and municipalities, which will increase deadweight losses and stall economic productivity.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>Josh Meyerson (LAW \u201924) is a Production Editor for the Temple 10-Q.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On March 7, 2023, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania heard oral argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia. The case brings to the limelight several constitutional and tax policy issues pervading interstate taxation at the state and local levels.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":3566,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,2617,17,9,1869],"tags":[2616,546,1434,83,1935,246,669,346,323,479,2401,2618],"coauthors":[2557],"class_list":["post-3565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business-law-practice","category-pennsylvania-law","category-student-authored","category-tax","category-temple-law","tag-commerce-clause","tag-constitutional-law","tag-credit","tag-delaware","tag-income","tag-pennsylvania","tag-philadelphia","tag-policy","tag-tax","tag-taxpayers","tag-wilmington","tag-zika","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tax Quarterly: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Hears Oral Argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia - The Temple 10-Q<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tax Quarterly: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Hears Oral Argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia - The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On March 7, 2023, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania heard oral argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia. The case brings to the limelight several constitutional and tax policy issues pervading interstate taxation at the state and local levels.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-04-04T15:14:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2023\/04\/Photo-1-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Josh Meyerson (LAW \u201924)\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Josh Meyerson (LAW \u201924)\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Erica Maier\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a\"},\"headline\":\"Tax Quarterly: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Hears Oral Argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-04T15:14:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/\"},\"wordCount\":904,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2023\/04\/Photo-1-1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Commerce Clause\",\"Constitutional Law\",\"Credit\",\"Delaware\",\"income\",\"Pennsylvania\",\"Philadelphia\",\"Policy\",\"Tax\",\"Taxpayers\",\"Wilmington\",\"Zika\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Business Law Practice\",\"Pennsylvania Law\",\"Student Authored\",\"Tax\",\"Temple Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/\",\"name\":\"Tax Quarterly: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Hears Oral Argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia - The Temple 10-Q\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2023\/04\/Photo-1-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-04T15:14:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2023\/04\/Photo-1-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2023\/04\/Photo-1-1.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1280},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tax Quarterly: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Hears Oral Argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\",\"name\":\"The Temple 10-Q\",\"description\":\"Temple&#039;s Business Law Magazine\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a\",\"name\":\"Erica Maier\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g5e523333d61dc7fabb86b49c5ffcbaee\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Erica Maier\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/emaier\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tax Quarterly: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Hears Oral Argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia - The Temple 10-Q","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tax Quarterly: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Hears Oral Argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia - The Temple 10-Q","og_description":"On March 7, 2023, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania heard oral argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia. The case brings to the limelight several constitutional and tax policy issues pervading interstate taxation at the state and local levels.","og_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/","og_site_name":"The Temple 10-Q","article_published_time":"2023-04-04T15:14:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1280,"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2023\/04\/Photo-1-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Josh Meyerson (LAW \u201924)","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Josh Meyerson (LAW \u201924)","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/"},"author":{"name":"Erica Maier","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a"},"headline":"Tax Quarterly: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Hears Oral Argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia","datePublished":"2023-04-04T15:14:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/"},"wordCount":904,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2023\/04\/Photo-1-1.jpg","keywords":["Commerce Clause","Constitutional Law","Credit","Delaware","income","Pennsylvania","Philadelphia","Policy","Tax","Taxpayers","Wilmington","Zika"],"articleSection":["Business Law Practice","Pennsylvania Law","Student Authored","Tax","Temple Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/","name":"Tax Quarterly: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Hears Oral Argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia - The Temple 10-Q","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2023\/04\/Photo-1-1.jpg","datePublished":"2023-04-04T15:14:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2023\/04\/Photo-1-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2023\/04\/Photo-1-1.jpg","width":1920,"height":1280},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/tax-quarterly-the-supreme-court-of-pennsylvania-hears-oral-argument-in-zilka-v-tax-review-board-city-of-philadelphia\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tax Quarterly: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Hears Oral Argument in Zilka v. Tax Review Board City of Philadelphia"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/","name":"The Temple 10-Q","description":"Temple&#039;s Business Law Magazine","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a","name":"Erica Maier","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g5e523333d61dc7fabb86b49c5ffcbaee","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Erica Maier"},"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/emaier\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2023\/04\/Photo-1-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3565"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3565\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3566"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3565"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}