{"id":3309,"date":"2022-04-28T13:53:26","date_gmt":"2022-04-28T17:53:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/10q\/?p=3309"},"modified":"2022-04-28T13:53:26","modified_gmt":"2022-04-28T17:53:26","slug":"fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/","title":{"rendered":"Fundamental Procedural Fairness: The Sine Qua Non for the Enforcement of Third-Party Releases Authorized in a Foreign Proceeding"},"content":{"rendered":"

Third-party releases remain a hot-button issue in U.S. bankruptcy cases and are carefully scrutinized in chapter 15 cases, where such releases originate in a foreign restructuring case or process. In PT Bakrie Telecom Tbk<\/em>, the chapter 15 court refused to enforce third-party releases authorized by an Indonesian court, and articulated an analytical framework that courts and practitioners can employ when considering a foreign representative\u2019s request for additional assistance, i.e., approval of a foreign restructuring with third-party releases.<\/p>\n

In 2010 and 2011, Bakrie Telecom Pte. Ltd. issued $380 million in notes and loaned the proceeds to PT Bakrie Telecom Tbk (BTEL), its Indonesian parent company, which guaranteed repayment of the notes. After BTEL defaulted, a group of noteholders obtained a New York state court judgment against it. However, BTEL was subject to a reorganization proceeding before the Indonesia Commercial Court, which subsequently approved BTEL\u2019s composition plan, including third-party releases of BTEL\u2019s liability on the notes.<\/p>\n

In BTEL\u2019s chapter 15 case, the court recognized the Indonesian proceeding as a \u201cforeign main proceeding,\u201d but denied the foreign representative\u2019s request to enforce third-party releases.<\/p>\n

The twin \u201cgating issues\u201d regarding the releases were whether (a) the Indonesian court had authority to grant the releases, and (b) enforcing the releases would be appropriate as a matter of comity or under \u00a7\u00a7 1507 and 1521(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy court found that the comity analysis overlapped with the requirements of \u00a7\u00a7 1507 and 1521(a). Indeed, bankruptcy courts may provide a foreign representative with \u201cadditional assistance\u201d under \u00a7 1507 where such assistance is \u201cconsistent with principles of comity\u201d and the court is satisfied that, inter alia<\/em>, it will provide for the \u201cjust treatment of all holders of claims\u201d and protect U.S. claimants from \u201cprejudice and inconvenience\u201d in the foreign proceeding, and may grant a foreign representative \u201cany appropriate relief\u201d under \u00a7 1521(a) if necessary to, inter alia<\/em>, \u201cprotect the assets of the debtor or the interests of the creditors.\u201d Because of these findings, its decision turned largely on whether the foreign proceeding (1) abided by fundamental standards of procedural fairness, (2) violated fundamental U.S. public policy, and (3) was affected by fraud.<\/p>\n

The bankruptcy court found that the Indonesian proceeding had not established a \u201cclear and formal record\u201d showing that fundamental standards of procedural fairness ensuring the just treatment and protection of U.S. claimants against prejudice had been observed. Most important was the absence from the record of any \u201cjustification\u201d for the releases, which may have been less concerning, but for unrebutted testimony that third-party releases were not standard for Indonesian proceedings. Holding that the parties could not rely on mere post-hoc<\/em> rationalizations, the court therefore would not enforce the releases granted by the Indonesian court without at least a \u201crudimentary record\u201d as to their basis and the procedural fairness of the underlying process.<\/p>\n

PT Bakrie<\/em> is a decision about fairness, process, and procedure. While the court refused to enforce the third-party releases under chapter 15, its analysis does not appear to depart from prior precedent considering and enforcing foreign third-party releases in the U.S. Thus, parties benefiting from a foreign court\u2019s order\u2014particularly where there are significant creditor objections or little precedent as to the fairness and procedural safeguards employed by the court\u2014should urge the foreign court to make detailed findings and conclusions concerning its jurisdiction, the notice and opportunity to object afforded to interested parties, and the basis for its decision.<\/p>\n

The full article in its original form can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Matthew E. Kaslow (LAW \u201915) is an associate at Blank Rome LLP in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He concentrates his practice on corporate finance, restructuring, and bankruptcy matters, and related litigation. He represents secured and unsecured creditors, creditors\u2019 committees, liquidating trustees, and chapter 11 debtors. <\/em><\/p>\n

Ira L. Herman is a partner at Blank Rome LLP in New York, New York. Herman concentrates his practice on restructuring and bankruptcy matters with emphasis on distressed public debt issues, secured and unsecured loans, cross-border insolvency matters, distressed M&A, and corporate governance. <\/em><\/p>\n

Evan J. Zucker is of counsel at Blank Rome LLP in New York, New York. Zucker concentrates his practice on corporate reorganizations and related complex litigation in national and cross-border matters. He routinely publishes and speaks on bankruptcy topics.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Matthew E. Kaslow (LAW \u201915) of Blank Rome LLP co-authored an article discussing the hot-button issue of third-party releases in U.S. bankruptcy cases, in the context of chapter 15 cases involving foreign restructuring.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":3310,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,13,38,20],"tags":[77,2448,311,1914,2449,2450,2169],"coauthors":[2445,2446,2447],"class_list":["post-3309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-alumni-authored","category-business-law-practice","category-regulated-industries","category-technology","tag-bankruptcy","tag-chapter-15","tag-civil-procedure","tag-foreign-business","tag-pt-bakrie-telecom-tbk","tag-releases","tag-third-party","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"yoast_head":"\nFundamental Procedural Fairness: The Sine Qua Non for the Enforcement of Third-Party Releases Authorized in a Foreign Proceeding - The Temple 10-Q<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fundamental Procedural Fairness: The Sine Qua Non for the Enforcement of Third-Party Releases Authorized in a Foreign Proceeding - The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Matthew E. Kaslow (LAW \u201915) of Blank Rome LLP co-authored an article discussing the hot-button issue of third-party releases in U.S. bankruptcy cases, in the context of chapter 15 cases involving foreign restructuring.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-28T17:53:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/04\/KASLOW_2-scaled-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ira L. Herman, Evan J. Zucker, Matthew E. Kaslow (LAW \u201915)\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ira L. Herman, Evan J. Zucker, Matthew E. Kaslow (LAW \u201915)\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Erica Maier\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a\"},\"headline\":\"Fundamental Procedural Fairness: The Sine Qua Non for the Enforcement of Third-Party Releases Authorized in a Foreign Proceeding\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-28T17:53:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/\"},\"wordCount\":717,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/04\/KASLOW_2-scaled-1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Bankruptcy\",\"Chapter 15\",\"civil procedure\",\"foreign business\",\"PT Bakrie Telecom Tbk\",\"Releases\",\"Third-party\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Alumni Authored\",\"Business Law Practice\",\"Regulated Industries\",\"Technology\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/\",\"name\":\"Fundamental Procedural Fairness: The Sine Qua Non for the Enforcement of Third-Party Releases Authorized in a Foreign Proceeding - The Temple 10-Q\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/04\/KASLOW_2-scaled-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-28T17:53:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/04\/KASLOW_2-scaled-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/04\/KASLOW_2-scaled-1.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1707},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fundamental Procedural Fairness: The Sine Qua Non for the Enforcement of Third-Party Releases Authorized in a Foreign Proceeding\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\",\"name\":\"The Temple 10-Q\",\"description\":\"Temple's Business Law Magazine\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a\",\"name\":\"Erica Maier\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g5e523333d61dc7fabb86b49c5ffcbaee\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Erica Maier\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/emaier\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fundamental Procedural Fairness: The Sine Qua Non for the Enforcement of Third-Party Releases Authorized in a Foreign Proceeding - The Temple 10-Q","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fundamental Procedural Fairness: The Sine Qua Non for the Enforcement of Third-Party Releases Authorized in a Foreign Proceeding - The Temple 10-Q","og_description":"Matthew E. Kaslow (LAW \u201915) of Blank Rome LLP co-authored an article discussing the hot-button issue of third-party releases in U.S. bankruptcy cases, in the context of chapter 15 cases involving foreign restructuring.","og_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/","og_site_name":"The Temple 10-Q","article_published_time":"2022-04-28T17:53:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1707,"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/04\/KASLOW_2-scaled-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ira L. Herman, Evan J. Zucker, Matthew E. Kaslow (LAW \u201915)","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ira L. Herman, Evan J. Zucker, Matthew E. Kaslow (LAW \u201915)","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/"},"author":{"name":"Erica Maier","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a"},"headline":"Fundamental Procedural Fairness: The Sine Qua Non for the Enforcement of Third-Party Releases Authorized in a Foreign Proceeding","datePublished":"2022-04-28T17:53:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/"},"wordCount":717,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/04\/KASLOW_2-scaled-1.jpg","keywords":["Bankruptcy","Chapter 15","civil procedure","foreign business","PT Bakrie Telecom Tbk","Releases","Third-party"],"articleSection":["Alumni Authored","Business Law Practice","Regulated Industries","Technology"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/","name":"Fundamental Procedural Fairness: The Sine Qua Non for the Enforcement of Third-Party Releases Authorized in a Foreign Proceeding - The Temple 10-Q","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/04\/KASLOW_2-scaled-1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-28T17:53:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/04\/KASLOW_2-scaled-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/04\/KASLOW_2-scaled-1.jpg","width":2560,"height":1707},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/fundamental-procedural-fairness-the-sine-qua-non-for-the-enforcement-of-third-party-releases-authorized-in-a-foreign-proceeding\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fundamental Procedural Fairness: The Sine Qua Non for the Enforcement of Third-Party Releases Authorized in a Foreign Proceeding"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/","name":"The Temple 10-Q","description":"Temple's Business Law Magazine","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a","name":"Erica Maier","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g5e523333d61dc7fabb86b49c5ffcbaee","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Erica Maier"},"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/emaier\/"}]}},"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/04\/KASLOW_2-scaled-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3309"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3309\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3310"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3309"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}