{"id":3026,"date":"2021-07-06T15:52:19","date_gmt":"2021-07-06T19:52:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/10q\/?p=3026"},"modified":"2021-07-06T15:52:19","modified_gmt":"2021-07-06T19:52:19","slug":"supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision in NCAA Antitrust Suit"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Summary<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On June 21, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in favor of student-athletes in the highly anticipated antitrust suit, NCAA v. Alston, et.al., No. 20-512 (June 21, 2021). The Court unanimously ruled that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules restricting student-athletes\u2019 educational benefits are not entitled to deference under the antitrust laws and are subject to antitrust scrutiny under a &#8220;rule-of-reason&#8221; analysis. The Court upheld the trial court injunction against NCAA rules limiting the education-related benefits schools may offer student-athletes\u2014such as rules that prohibit schools from offering graduate or vocational school scholarships. Justice Brett Kavanaugh\u2019s concurrence cautioned that while the decision only considered NCAA restrictions on educational benefits, under its reasoning there are \u201cserious questions\u201d regarding whether the NCAA\u2019s remaining restrictions on non-educational compensation are permissible under antitrust laws. Perhaps in an effort to avoid litigation utilizing the reasoning in <em>NCAA v. Alston<\/em> and following a wave of state statutes that disallow NCAA\u2019s bar on student-athlete compensation, on June 30 the NCAA issued an interim policy permitting student-athletes to be paid for the use of their name, image, and likeness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The Upshot<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Courts are likely to clarify what does and does not constitute educational benefits under this ruling, so schools should look for future updates to NCAA rules regarding what benefits they can and cannot offer student-athletes. The trial court order, affirmed by the Supreme Court, permits the NCAA to develop its own definition of educational benefits and to seek modification of the court\u2019s injunction to reflect that definition.<\/li><li>The Court\u2019s ruling is likely to encourage other student-athletes to challenge the NCAA\u2019s rules, especially the current limits on student-athlete compensation. Justice Kavanaugh\u2019s concurring opinion emphasized that \u201cserious questions\u201d exist regarding whether the NCAA\u2019s remaining compensation rules are lawful, remarking that the NCAA\u2019s business model would be \u201cflatly illegal in almost any other industry in America.\u201d<\/li><li>The NCAA, other collegiate athletic conferences, and individual schools also may see lawsuits seeking damages (which are trebled under the antitrust laws), attorneys\u2019 fees, and\/or injunctions for adopting and complying with the enjoined education benefits rules or any other compensation limitation later found to be unlawful under the antitrust laws.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Takeaways<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Immediately, the Supreme Court\u2019s decision means that the challenged NCAA rules limiting educational benefits for student-athletes remain enjoined. If the NCAA chooses to take advantage of the district court\u2019s order allowing it to submit a proposed definition of what benefits are and are not education related, we could see further guidance on the kinds of benefits schools may or may not provide their student athletes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>More broadly, the decision is likely to encourage further challenges to NCAA rules and rules imposed by collegiate athletic conferences regarding limits on both educational and non-educational benefits and compensation for student-athletes. The lawsuits, which are likely to be against both collegiate athletic conferences and individual schools that agree to and enforce conference rules, could seek damages (which are trebled under the antitrust laws), attorneys\u2019 fees, and\/or injunctions for adopting and complying with the enjoined education benefits rules or any other compensation limitation later found to be unlawful under the antitrust laws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The full article in its original form can be found <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ballardspahr.com\/Insights\/Alerts-and-Articles\/2021\/06\/SCOTUS-Rules-on-Highly-Anticipated-NCAA-Antitrust-Suit?utm_source=vuture&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=supreme%20court%20rules%20against%20ncaa%20in%20antitrust%20case#web\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Marcel Pratt (LAW \u201909) is a partner at Ballard Spahr, where he represents clients in high-stakes litigation and investigations. Marcel\u2019s practice includes complex commercial litigation, antitrust and competition law, products liability, internal and government investigations, class actions, and First Amendment law.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Elizabeth (Lizzy) Wingfield (LAW \u201817) is an associate at Ballard Spahr\u2019s litigation department, where she focuses her practice on Title IX cases and eminent domain.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Stephen Kastenberg is a partner at Ballard Spahr and a seasoned litigator with nearly 30 years\u2019 experience. His practice focuses on complex business litigation with an emphasis on antitrust and competition, securities, and corporate governance litigation.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules restricting student-athletes\u2019 educational benefits are not entitled to deference under the antitrust laws and are subject to antitrust scrutiny under a &#8220;rule-of-reason&#8221; analysis. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":3027,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,33,70,61],"tags":[134,516,2226,2227,2228,342],"coauthors":[2069,2224,2225],"class_list":["post-3026","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-alumni-authored","category-antitrust","category-labor-and-employment","category-legal-developments","tag-antitrust","tag-benefits","tag-national-collegiate-athletic-association","tag-ncaa-v-alston","tag-student-athletes","tag-supreme-court","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision in NCAA Antitrust Suit - The Temple 10-Q<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision in NCAA Antitrust Suit - The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules restricting student-athletes\u2019 educational benefits are not entitled to deference under the antitrust laws and are subject to antitrust scrutiny under a &quot;rule-of-reason&quot; analysis.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-06T19:52:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2021\/07\/20190318_NCAA_060-Web-Res-JPEG-150-DPI.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1440\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"960\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stephen J. Kastenberg, Marcel S. Pratt (LAW \u201809), Elizabeth (Lizzy) Wingfield (LAW \u201817)\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stephen J. Kastenberg, Marcel S. Pratt (LAW \u201809), Elizabeth (Lizzy) Wingfield (LAW \u201817)\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Erica Maier\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision in NCAA Antitrust Suit\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-06T19:52:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/\"},\"wordCount\":650,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2021\/07\/20190318_NCAA_060-Web-Res-JPEG-150-DPI.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"antitrust\",\"Benefits\",\"National Collegiate Athletic Association\",\"NCAA v. Alston\",\"Student-Athletes\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Alumni Authored\",\"Antitrust\",\"Labor and Employment\",\"Legal Developments\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision in NCAA Antitrust Suit - The Temple 10-Q\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2021\/07\/20190318_NCAA_060-Web-Res-JPEG-150-DPI.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-06T19:52:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2021\/07\/20190318_NCAA_060-Web-Res-JPEG-150-DPI.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2021\/07\/20190318_NCAA_060-Web-Res-JPEG-150-DPI.jpg\",\"width\":1440,\"height\":960,\"caption\":\"2019_03 _18 NCAA Day 1\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision in NCAA Antitrust Suit\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\",\"name\":\"The Temple 10-Q\",\"description\":\"Temple&#039;s Business Law Magazine\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a\",\"name\":\"Erica Maier\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g5e523333d61dc7fabb86b49c5ffcbaee\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Erica Maier\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/emaier\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision in NCAA Antitrust Suit - The Temple 10-Q","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision in NCAA Antitrust Suit - The Temple 10-Q","og_description":"The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules restricting student-athletes\u2019 educational benefits are not entitled to deference under the antitrust laws and are subject to antitrust scrutiny under a \"rule-of-reason\" analysis.","og_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/","og_site_name":"The Temple 10-Q","article_published_time":"2021-07-06T19:52:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1440,"height":960,"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2021\/07\/20190318_NCAA_060-Web-Res-JPEG-150-DPI.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Stephen J. Kastenberg, Marcel S. Pratt (LAW \u201809), Elizabeth (Lizzy) Wingfield (LAW \u201817)","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stephen J. Kastenberg, Marcel S. Pratt (LAW \u201809), Elizabeth (Lizzy) Wingfield (LAW \u201817)","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/"},"author":{"name":"Erica Maier","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a"},"headline":"Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision in NCAA Antitrust Suit","datePublished":"2021-07-06T19:52:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/"},"wordCount":650,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2021\/07\/20190318_NCAA_060-Web-Res-JPEG-150-DPI.jpg","keywords":["antitrust","Benefits","National Collegiate Athletic Association","NCAA v. Alston","Student-Athletes","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Alumni Authored","Antitrust","Labor and Employment","Legal Developments"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/","name":"Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision in NCAA Antitrust Suit - The Temple 10-Q","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2021\/07\/20190318_NCAA_060-Web-Res-JPEG-150-DPI.jpg","datePublished":"2021-07-06T19:52:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2021\/07\/20190318_NCAA_060-Web-Res-JPEG-150-DPI.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2021\/07\/20190318_NCAA_060-Web-Res-JPEG-150-DPI.jpg","width":1440,"height":960,"caption":"2019_03 _18 NCAA Day 1"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-decision-in-ncaa-antitrust-suit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision in NCAA Antitrust Suit"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/","name":"The Temple 10-Q","description":"Temple&#039;s Business Law Magazine","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/d88f9d6c1e573914b328a9fc287d495a","name":"Erica Maier","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g5e523333d61dc7fabb86b49c5ffcbaee","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287d6d70b5641c5fca2014a2642c81f4173a498c7b1d1dafac589e1a9dc74e18?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Erica Maier"},"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/emaier\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2021\/07\/20190318_NCAA_060-Web-Res-JPEG-150-DPI.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3026","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3026"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3026\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3027"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3026"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3026"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3026"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}