{"id":1287,"date":"2017-08-14T12:02:51","date_gmt":"2017-08-14T16:02:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/10q\/?p=1287"},"modified":"2017-08-14T12:02:51","modified_gmt":"2017-08-14T16:02:51","slug":"supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Decision on Specific Personal Jurisdiction a \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

On June 19, the Supreme Court handed down an opinion about specific personal jurisdiction that purported to be a \u201cnothingburger<\/a>\u201d: in the 8-1 decision, the Court explained that \u201csettled principles . . . control this case.\u201d But although only time will tell how juicy Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California<\/a> will turn out to be, it is already threatening to end a number of pending pharmaceutical product liability cases and it may have farther reaching effects throughout the litigation system. Many lawyers are hailing it as a \u201cgame changer<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the case, hundreds of plaintiffs sued Bristol-Myers Squibb in California state court, alleging that Plavix, a blood-thinner Bristol-Myers manufactured and marketed, had caused them injuries. Eighty-six of the plaintiffs had bought the drug or were injured in California; the rest had claims identical to the California plaintiffs\u2019, but had bought the drug and were injured elsewhere. A California court had originally asserted general (or \u201call-purpose\u201d) personal jurisdiction over Bristol-Myers because of the company\u2019s extensive contacts doing business in the state. But after the Supreme Court narrowed the scope of general jurisdiction to states where the defendant was \u201cat home\u201d (for a corporation, its principal place of business or place of incorporation), the California courts held that there was only specific<\/em> (or \u201ccase-linked\u201d) personal jurisdiction over Bristol-Myers.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court disagreed. A court may exercise specific personal jurisdiction where the suit \u201carises out of or relates to the defendant\u2019s contacts with the forum.\u201d This case raised the question: What does \u201carises out of or relates to\u201d mean? Bristol-Myers urged that a causal connection is required between the defendant\u2019s forum contacts and the plaintiff\u2019s claim. Under that theory, Bristol-Myers\u2019 Plavix marketing in California may have \u201ccaused\u201d the California plaintiffs to buy (and then be injured by) Plavix, giving the California court specific jurisdiction over Bristol-Myers for those claims, but those California marketing efforts did not similarly cause the harm to plaintiffs who bought Plavix in Texas, and therefore there should be no personal jurisdiction with respect to them. As other civil procedure professors and I argued in an amicus brief<\/a> before the Court, that novel interpretation would have had disruptive, inefficient, and unfair effects on both straightforward and complex litigation in both state and federal courts.<\/p>\n

The Court did not go so far as to adopt Bristol-Myers\u2019 \u201ccausation\u201d rule. Instead, it held simply that the requisite \u201cconnection between the forum and the [non-residents\u2019] specific claims at issue\u201d was lacking, even if some California plaintiffs could assert claims similar to the non-residents\u2019. To aggregate claims that arise out of a nationwide course of conduct, like the sale of Plavix, plaintiffs would have to sue either in the defendant\u2019s home state (where there is general \u201call-purpose\u201d jurisdiction) or somewhere that has a stronger connection to all the plaintiffs\u2019 claims (like where Plavix is manufactured).<\/p>\n

This holding leaves open many questions about what kind of connection between a forum and a claim would support specific jurisdiction. (If two factories manufacture Plavix, can all the Plavix-injured plaintiffs sue in one factory\u2019s home state? Do they have to determine which factory manufactured the Plavix they took?) For now, Bristol-Myers <\/em>is most directly affecting pharmaceutical product liability cases, such as the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder product liability litigation<\/a> and the Sanofi Taxotere litigation<\/a>, leading to immediate dismissals of large numbers of claims and plaintiffs scrambling<\/a> for additional jurisdictional discovery to keep out-of-state plaintiffs\u2019 claims alive. The similarity between in-state and out-of-state plaintiffs\u2019 claims alone does not provide the requisite connection, but the connection can probably be based on something less than causation.<\/p>\n

How much will Bristol-Myers <\/em>curb other kinds of litigation? Personal jurisdiction purports to be substance-neutral in its application\u2014there is certainly no reason its impact would be limited to pharmaceutical cases. And while Bristol-Myers<\/em> involved state court litigation that was not brought as a class action, it has the potential to limit both state and federal court litigation in a range of complex postures, especially class actions and multidistrict litigation.<\/p>\n

The impact that may be most difficult to measure, and most sought after by corporate defendants, is the reduction in lawsuits brought altogether due to potential plaintiffs\u2019 inability to aggregate claims outside of the defendant\u2019s home state (where the defendant would be subject to general jurisdiction). This effect will be most pronounced (even if silent) when the defendant is a foreign corporation, which is not \u201cat home\u201d\u2014and therefore not subject to general jurisdiction\u2014in any US state. US courts must have specific \u201ccase-linked\u201d jurisdiction to hear claims against foreign defendants, and specific jurisdiction just got narrower.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Prof. Pamela Bookman discusses the \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d of SCOTUS\u2019s recent decision impacting specific personal jurisdiction<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":1288,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,8],"tags":[391,392,311,110,393,394,395,396,397,342],"coauthors":[2,108],"class_list":["post-1287","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business-law-practice","category-faculty-authored","tag-amicus-brief","tag-bristol-myers-squibb","tag-civil-procedure","tag-litigation","tag-pharmaceuticals","tag-plavix","tag-scotus","tag-specific-personal-jurisdiction","tag-superior-court-of-california","tag-supreme-court","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Decision on Specific Personal Jurisdiction a \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d - The Temple 10-Q<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Decision on Specific Personal Jurisdiction a \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d - The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Prof. Pamela Bookman discusses the \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d of SCOTUS\u2019s recent decision impacting specific personal jurisdiction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Temple 10-Q\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-08-14T16:02:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Books Schatschneider, Pamela Bookman\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Books Schatschneider, Pamela Bookman\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Books Schatschneider\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court Decision on Specific Personal Jurisdiction a \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-08-14T16:02:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/\"},\"wordCount\":775,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2017\/08\/capsule-1079838_1920.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Amicus Brief\",\"Bristol-Myers Squibb\",\"civil procedure\",\"Litigation\",\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"Plavix\",\"SCOTUS\",\"Specific Personal Jurisdiction\",\"Superior Court of California\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Business Law Practice\",\"Faculty Authored\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Decision on Specific Personal Jurisdiction a \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d - The Temple 10-Q\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2017\/08\/capsule-1079838_1920.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-08-14T16:02:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2017\/08\/capsule-1079838_1920.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2017\/08\/capsule-1079838_1920.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1280},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Decision on Specific Personal Jurisdiction a \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/\",\"name\":\"The Temple 10-Q\",\"description\":\"Temple's Business Law Magazine\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154\",\"name\":\"Books Schatschneider\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g9dc77189f33a293d2c82a50cd24ebb9f\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Books Schatschneider\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/rschatsc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Decision on Specific Personal Jurisdiction a \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d - The Temple 10-Q","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Decision on Specific Personal Jurisdiction a \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d - The Temple 10-Q","og_description":"Prof. Pamela Bookman discusses the \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d of SCOTUS\u2019s recent decision impacting specific personal jurisdiction","og_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/","og_site_name":"The Temple 10-Q","article_published_time":"2017-08-14T16:02:51+00:00","author":"Books Schatschneider, Pamela Bookman","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Books Schatschneider, Pamela Bookman","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/"},"author":{"name":"Books Schatschneider","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154"},"headline":"Supreme Court Decision on Specific Personal Jurisdiction a \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d","datePublished":"2017-08-14T16:02:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/"},"wordCount":775,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2017\/08\/capsule-1079838_1920.jpg","keywords":["Amicus Brief","Bristol-Myers Squibb","civil procedure","Litigation","Pharmaceuticals","Plavix","SCOTUS","Specific Personal Jurisdiction","Superior Court of California","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Business Law Practice","Faculty Authored"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/","name":"Supreme Court Decision on Specific Personal Jurisdiction a \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d - The Temple 10-Q","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2017\/08\/capsule-1079838_1920.jpg","datePublished":"2017-08-14T16:02:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2017\/08\/capsule-1079838_1920.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2017\/08\/capsule-1079838_1920.jpg","width":1920,"height":1280},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/supreme-court-decision-specific-personal-jurisdiction-somethingburger\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Decision on Specific Personal Jurisdiction a \u201cSomethingBurger\u201d"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#website","url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/","name":"The Temple 10-Q","description":"Temple's Business Law Magazine","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/#\/schema\/person\/23e7012f0cf133dbeb0e76693c9e0154","name":"Books Schatschneider","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g9dc77189f33a293d2c82a50cd24ebb9f","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Books Schatschneider"},"url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/author\/rschatsc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2017\/08\/capsule-1079838_1920.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1287"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1287\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1288"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1287"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.temple.edu\/10q\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}